SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SYED NISSAR AHAMED – Appellant
Versus
FARHAN AMEEN SULTHAN – Respondent
RSA 2061/2013



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2061 OF 2013

BETWEEN

1

SYED NISSAR AHAMED

S/O SYED PEER,

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.2345, EREKATTE STREET, LASHKAR

MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001

2.

SYED IFTHIKAR

S/O SYED NISAAR AHAMED,

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO. 2345, EREKATTE STREET, LASHKAR

MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001 ...APPELLANT/S

(By Sri./Smt :SHOWRI H R ,AKSHAY D B AND

NATARAJ C D, ADVOCATES)

AND

1.

FARHAN AMEEN SULTHAN

W/O SYED AKRAM ULLAH,

D/O FATHIMA UNNISSA,

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

RESIDING AT: NO.2345, EREKATTE STREET,

LASHKAR MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001

&2

RSA NO. 2061/2013

2

2.

SYED GHOUSE

S/O SYED PEER, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.2345, EREKATTE STREET,

LASHKAR MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001

3.

RASHEEDA BEGUM

D/O SYED PEER, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.2345, EREKATTE STREET,

LASHKAR MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001

4.

SYED SAJEEDA AHAMED

S/O SYED PEER, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.2345, EREKATTE STREET,

LASHKAR MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001

5.

SYED ASLAM

S/O SYED PEER, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.2345, EREKATTE STREET,

LASHKAR MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001

ALL THE RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED

BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER

SYED NADEEM

S/O SYED GHOUSE AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.2345, EREKATTE STREET,

LASHKAR MOHALLA, MYSURU 570001

&RESPONDENT/S

(By Sri./Smt :AFZAL KHAN & SRI.G.V.SHASHI KUMAR,

ADVOCATES, {GPA Holder in respect of R1 to R5)

&3

RSA NO. 2061/2013

3

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF

CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.10.2013

PASSED IN R.A.NO.45/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRIRANGAPATNA, DISMISSING

THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE

DATED 12.07.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.69/2009 ON THE FILE OF

THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, SRIRANGAPATNA.

This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day

the Court made the following Order:-

ORDER

Two weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the

appellants to take steps in respect of deceased respondent No.5,

failing which, the appeal will be dismissed without reference to

the Bench.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 30.07.2021, office objections

are not complied with, hence appeal will be dismissed.

COPY

Sd/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

T By: SV

R By: PH

C By: HKV

SO : DS

Ty Date: 29.07.2022

C Date: 29.07.2022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top