SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SRI KRISHNA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI K V ABHAY KUMAR – Respondent
WP 10113/2016



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR

WRIT PETITION No.10113/2016(GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI KRISHNA KUMAR

S/O LATE K. VISHWANATHA SHASTRY,

AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,

R/AT NO.430, KUMARA NILAYA,

SUBBARAYANAPETE, WARD NO.20,

CHIKKABALLAPUR-562 101

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.

A)

SMT. SHASHIKALA,

W/O. LATE KRISHNA KUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

B)

SMT. K.S. SOUDHAMANI,

W/O. R.G. NAGARAJA RAO,

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

C)

SRI VISHWANATHA K.,

S/O. LATE KRISHNA KUMAR

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

ALL ARE RESIDING AT:

NO.430, KUMARA NILAYA,

2

SUBBARAYANAPETE, WARD NO.20,

CHIKKABALLAPUR-562 101

&PETITIONERS

(BY SRI SRINIVASA D.C., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI K.V. ABHAY KUMAR

S/O LATE VISHWANATHA SHASTRY,

AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,

R/AT NO.139, 29TH CROSS,

14TH MAIN, II STAGE,

BANASHANKARI,

BENGALURU-560 070.

2.

SRI K.V. NAGENDRA KUMAR

S/O LATE K. VISHWANATHA SHASTRY,

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

R/AT NO.430, SUBBARAYANAPETE,

WARD NO.20,

CHIKKABALLAPUR-562 101.

3.

SRI K.V. SATISH KUMAR

S/O LATE K. VISHWANATHA SHASTRY,

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

R/AT NO.112/1G, 7TH CROSS,

MARENAHALLI PALYA,

J.P. NAGARA, II PHASE,

BENGALURU-560 078.

4.

SRI SUBRAMANYA

S/O SURYANARAYANA,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

3

R/AT SAI KRISHNA RESIDENCY

NO.139, GF-2,

SAPTAGIRI LAYOUT,

UTTARAHALLI,

BENGALURU-560 061.

5.

SRI A. NARENDRA

S/O LATE ANIL KUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

R/AT NO.239, 4TH MAIN,

JAYANAGAR, III PHASE,

BENGALURU-560 078.

6.

SMT. UMADEVI

D/O LATE VISHWANATHA SHASTRY,

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

R/AT NO.120, II MAIN,

SHARADA RESIDENCY

PAUL CHINNAPPA LAYOUT,

BIKASIPURA, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT,

BENGALURU-560 078.

& RESPONDENTS

-----

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO

QUASH THE ORDER ON I.A. 5 PASSED BY THE

HON9BLE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPUR IN

O.S. 6/2014 DATED 03.02.2016 AT ANNEXURE3H AS

ILLEGAL AND VOID, ETC.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN 8B9 GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE

THE FOLLOWING:-

4

ORDER

Learned Advocate for the petitioners seeks leave

to withdraw the petition. He has filed memo of even

date to the said effect. Leave granted. Memo be kept

in record.

2.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SBS*

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top