SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. THOTADA DURGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 27383/2019



W.P. No.27383 OF 2019

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

WRIT PETITION NO.27383 OF 2019 (KLR RR/SUR)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. THOTADA DURGAPPA

S/O KERIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

2.

SRI. DATTATREYA.D.B.

S/O BHEEMAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

3.

SRI. REVANAPPA

S/O DURGAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

4.

SRI. ADI RAMAPPA

S/O GIDDAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

5.

SRI. ADI KERIYAPPA

S/O ADI BANGARAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

6.

SRI. GURUMURTHY.D.B

S/O BHEEMAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

7.

SRI. D. CHENDRAPPA

S/O GIDAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

8.

ADI HOLIYAPPA

S/O GIDAPPA

AGED ABOUT YEARS

W.P. No.27383 OF 2019

2

ALL ARE RESIDING AT

BIDARAGERE VILLAGE

KASABA HOBLI

SORABA TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT-

577201

...PETITIONERS

(BY SMT. PAVITHRA.N, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. NAVEEN.J.N, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT

VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

BANGALORE-560001

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

SHIMOGA

SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577201

3.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

SAGAR SUB-DIVISION

SAGAR-577201

4.

THE TAHSILDAR

SORAB

SORAB TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577429

5.

VIRUPAKSHI.A.K

S/O BASAVANEYAPPA.A.K

AGED ABOUT YEARS

R/AT UDRI VILLAGE

SORAB TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577429

… RESPONDENTS

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227

OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER

PASSED BY THE R-2 DATED 14.03.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND

W.P. No.27383 OF 2019

3

QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-3 DATED 22.06.2018 VIDE

ANNEXURE-F.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking

withdrawal of the above petition as not pressed.

Said memo is taken on record and is allowed.

The petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

ln

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top