Advocates:
['JAGADISH PATIL', 'K ANAND', '', '', 'R : TAMANNA - HELD SUFFICIENT', '', 'R : SHANKAR - HELD SUFFICIENT', 'R : SHIVAPPA-HELD SUFFICIENT', 'R : VIRUPAXI - SD', 'R : MALAKAJI- HELD SUFFICIENT', 'R : NAGAPPA - HELD SUFFICIENT']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIERSH

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1491/2006 (INJ)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. NEELAWWA W/O DYAMAPPA GADAGI

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK

R/O BETASUR, TAL: SAUNDATTI

DISTRICT: BELGAUM 590 001

2.

SMT. SHIVALINGAWWA W/O KALLAPPA

KANNALLI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

REST 3DO-

&APPELLANTS

(BY SRI.C.S.SHETTAR, ADVOCATE

FOR SRI.JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI TAMMANNA W/O RAMAPPA CHANAKOTI

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O BETASUR

TAL: SAUNDATTI, DISTRICT: BELGAUM 590 001

2.

SRI SHANKAR S/O RAMAPPA CHANAKOTI

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

REST 3DO-

3.

SRI SHIVAPPA S/O RAMAPPA CHANAKOTI

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

REST 3DO-

2

4.

SRI VIRUPAXI S/O RAMAPPA CHANAKOTI

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

REST 3DO-

5.

SRI MALAKAJI S/O RAMAPPA CHANAKOTI

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

REST 3DO-

6.

SRI NAGAPPA S/O RAMAPPA CHANAKOTI

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

REST 3DO-

&RESPONDENTS

(NOTICE TO R1 TO R3, R5 & R6 IS HELD SUFFICIENT,

NOTICE TO R4 SERVED)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER

SECTION 100 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

JUDGMENT A