SRI SANDEEP H C – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 2985/2019
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2985 OF 2019
BETWEEN
Sri. Sandeep H.C
S/o D.R. Chandrashekar
Aged about 38 years
Village Accountant
Indavara Circle
R/at Undedasarahalli
C/o Kumar
S/o Shankarappa
Chikkamagalur 3 577101.
... Petitioner
(By Sri. Anjan Kumar - Advocate for
Sri. Mohammed Faruke - Advocate)
AND
1.
The State of Karnataka
By A.C.B. Police
Chikkamagalore
Through State Public Prosecutor
High Court Building
High Court of Karnataka
Bangalore 3 560 001.
2.
Sri. Harish
S/o. Shivanna
Aged about 31 years
R/at Nallur Gate
: 2 :
Amruth Pharam
Maruthi Nagara
Chikkamagalore 3 577101.
... Respondents
(By Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi 3 Spl.P.P. for R-1
vide order dated 15.07.2021)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to allow this
petition and quash the entire proceedings in Special Case
No.59/2018 (Crime No.1/2016) on the file of the Principal
District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge at
Chikkamagalu, including the complaint and FIR in Crime
No.1/2016 registered by the Respondent 3 Police.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders, this
day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
Sri Anjan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner
is present before the Court physically and representing Sri
Mohammed Faruke, learned counsel who is on record. Sri
Jeevan J.Neeralagi, learned Spl.PP for respondent No.1 3
ACB Police, Chikkamaglur is on record.
2. Counsel for the petitioner is seeking for some
short accommodation to furnish requisite process fee
along with copy of petition for issuance of notice against
: 3 :
respondent No.2. Therefore, it is deemed appropriate to
observe that when once the FIR has been recorded,
learned Spl.PP has to take care of respondent No.2 who is
arraigned as complainant as under Section 301 of Cr.P.C.
3. Respondent No.2 3 Harish, S/o Shivanna is
arraigned as complainant in Crime No.1/2016. Based
upon
his
complaint
filed
before
the
ACB
Police,
Chikkamagalur, the case came to be registered for the
offences punishable under Section 7 r/w Section 13(2) of
the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Subsequently,
the investigating officer took up the case for investigation
and laid the charge sheet against the accused before the
Court having jurisdiction and the same is pending in
Spl.Case No.59/2018 before the Prl.District and Sessions
Judge and Special Judge at Chikkamagalur.
4. Whereas in this matter the petitioner had filed an
application under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. r/w 19 of the
P.C.Act and the same came to be rejected on 11.03.2019
by the trial Court. Now the case is set down for framing of
charge. But under this petition seeking for quashment of
: 4 :
the criminal proceedings initiated against the accused in
Spl.Case No.59/2018 arising out of Crime No.1/2016
which is pending before the court having jurisdiction.
5. It is relevant to refer the nutshell of the
prosecution case is that the accused at the time of alleged
incident was working as Village Accountant and serving in
Indavara Circle of Chikkamagalur Taluk. CW.1 3 Harish
had given an application seeking permission to purchase
agricultural land and the said application was referred to
the accused by the Revenue Inspector 3 CW.4. CW.1
approached the accused several times and accused for one
or the other reasons was dodging the process of grant of
permission to purchase the land. But on 17.06.2016, that
the complainant who is a gravamen of the case again
approached the accused/petitioner and on that day the
accused demanded bribe of Rs.5,000/- for clearing his file
relating to the application filed by him to purchase of
agricultural land. While approaching the accused the
complainant had recorded some conversation between
himself and acc