KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
RAKESH S – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 6132/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRL. P. NO. 6132/2020
BETWEEN:
RAKESH. S, S/O SONNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
C/O RADHAKRISHNA, 4TH CROSS,
GANDHIPURA, WHITEFIELD,
BENGALURU, PIN 560 066.
-
PETITIONER
(BY SRI UDAYAKUMAR B.A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
VARTHUR POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU-560 098,
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
BENGALURU-560 001.
-
RESPONDENT
(BY SRI VINAYAK V.S., H.C.G.P.)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF
CR.P.C. SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL
IN CRIME NO. 144/2020 OF VARTHUR POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU
REGISTERED
FOR
THE
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 341, 326, 307 R/W 34 OF
IPC & ETC.
: 2 :
THIS
CRIMINAL
PETITION
PERTAINING
TO
PRINCIPAL
BENCH,
BENGALURU
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS
THROUGH
VIDEO
CONFERENCING
AT
DHARWAD,
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard
petitioner’s
counsel
and
the
learned
H.C.G.P.
2.
This is a petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
by accused No.3 in Crime No. 144/2020 registered by
Varthur Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offences
punishable under Section 341, 326, 307 r/w Sec. 34
IPC.
3.
The allegations are that all the accused wanted to
cause the death of CW2 as the latter did not agree for
selling the sites to them in the layout formed by him for
a lesser price. Therefore, on 04.07.2020 at about 6.00
p.m., all the accused stood near a school waiting for the
arrival of CW2. At about 8.15 p.m. when CW2 Narayan
Reddy was returning to his house, he was attacked and
assaulted, as a result, CW2 suffered severe injuries.
: 3 :
4.
Investigation is over. Learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that accused No.4 has been enlarged
on bail already, he refers to the order passed by the co-
ordinate Bench in Crl. P. No. 4108/2020.
5.
Learned H.C.G.P. submits that parity will not be
applicable as in the charge sheet specific overt acts are
not attributed to accused No.4.
6.
I have gone through the order passed by this
Court in Crl. P. No. 4108/2020. I find it difficult to
apply the rule of parity for enlarging petitioner on bail.
However, having regard to the fact that investigation is
over and that the injured has been discharged from the
hospital and also fact that he is a student, bail can be
granted. To secure his presence before the Court
during trial, he may be subjected to stringent
conditions. Hence, the following order.
: 4 :
ORDER
Bail petition filed u/s 439 Cr.P.C. filed by the
petitioner-accused NJo.3 is allowed. He shall be
enlarged on bail in Crime No. 144/2020 registered by
Varthur Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offences
punishable under Section 341, 326, 307 r/w Sec. 34
IPC. The petitioner is subjected to following conditions.
1.
The petitioner shall be released on bail on
obtaining from him a bond for Rs.1,00,000/-
and two sureties for the likesum to the
satisfaction of the trial Court;
2.
He shall not threaten the witnesses and destroy
the evidence in whatsoever manner;
3.
He shall regularly appear before the trial Court
till conclusion of trial.
4.
He shall mark his attendance once in a
fortnight, on a Sunday in between 9.00 a.m.
and 12.00 noon till conclusion of trial.
SD/-
JUDGE
bvv