SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DADDI ADAM – Appellant
Versus
MAHAMOOD DIWAN SAB BUCKATIGAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8315 OF 2016 (MV)

BETWEEN

1. DADDI ADAM,

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

S/O. DADDI KASIM

2. DADDI BIBI SAYEEDA

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

W/O. DADDI KASIM

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT

H.NO.9-177,

MUDRU MAKKI ROAD,

NEAR RAILWAY GATE,

HADAVINA KONE SHIROOR VILLAGE

KUNDAPURA TALUK-576 101.

... APPELLANTS

(BY MISS NASEEFA M. MULLA FOR SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA

SHETTY, ADVOCATES)

AND

1. MAHAMOOD DIWAN SAB BUCKATIGAR,

R/O. NOORANIGALLI, MUDGOD (N.K.)

2. UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

2A, 2ND FLOOR, 84-RAMSON COMPLEX

P.B. ROAD HOSUR, HUBLI,

REP: BY ITS MANAGER

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. H.N. KESHAVA PRASHANT, ADVOCATE FOR R2,

NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED 09.10.2018)

2

THIS MFA FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 25.05.2016

PASSED IN MVC NO.1095/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION'S JUDGE, ADDITIONAL

MACT, KUNDAPURA, ON C/C. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MEMBER,

ADDITIONAL MACT, KUNDAPURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE

CLAIM

PE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top