JAYANNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.RP 548/2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.548/2012
BETWEEN:
JAYANNA
S/O THIMMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
DRIVER OF GOODS VEHICLE
RESIDING AT HALEPALYA
TIPTUR TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT 572202
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AMIT ANAND DESHPANDE, AMICUS CURIAE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY TIPTUR RURAL POLICE REPRESENTED BY STATE
PUBLIC PROSECUTORHIGH COURT
BUILDING,BANGALOORU
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. V.S. VINAYAKA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED
UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF CR.PC
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED:7.5.10
PASSED
BY
THE
PRL.CJ
AND
JMFC,
TIPTUR
IN
2
C.C.NO.308/09 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/SEC.279
AND 304-A IPC AND FURTHER TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT DATED:3.4.12 PASSED BY THE PO, FTC,
TIPTUR IN CRL.A.NO.59/10 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER
BY ALLOWING THE THIS PETITION.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON
FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R
Heard Sri. Amit Anand Deshpande, learned Amicus
Curiae appearing for the revision petitioner and Sri. V. S.
Vinayaka,
learned
High
Court
Government
Pleader
appearing for respondent and perused the records.
2.
The revision petition is filed by the accused,
who has been convicted for the offences punishable under
Sections 279 and 304A of IPC and confirmed by the First
Appellate Court whereby, the accused is sentenced to
undergo simple imprisonment of three months for the
offence punishable under Section 279 of IPC and six
months simple imprisonment for the offence punishable
under Section 304A of IPC and ordered to pay fine of
Rs.500/- and Rs.3,000/- respectively.
3
3.
Brief facts of the case are as under:
That on 25.11.2008 at about 7.20 a.m., near
Ramaiah of Manjunathanagar situated at Tiptur-Halkurike
Road, accused - revision petitioner being the driver of the
mini lorry bearing No.KA-06-9183 came in a rash and
negligent manner and dashed against Srinivas, who was
proceeding on his Hero Honda Splender Motor Cycle
bearing No.KA-05-EP-3816 whereby the said Srinivas
suffered grievous and fatal injuries and he was shifted to
Sanjay Gandhi Hospital, Bengaluru when he succumbed to
the injuries. Hence, the dependants of the deceased
sought for awarding suitable compensaion.
4.
The Tipturu Rural jurisdictional police have
registered a case based on the said complaint, investigated
the matter and laid a charge sheet against the accused for
the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304A of
IPC and under Section 134(a) and (b) of the Indian Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.
4
5.
After taking the cognizance, the presence of
the accused was secured by the learned Magistrate and
plea was recorded. Accused pleaded not guilty, therefore,
the trial was held. In order to prove the case of the
prosecution, the prosecution in all examined eleven
witnesses and relied on documentary evidences, which
were exhibited and marked at Exs.P1 to P11. On
conclusion of the prosecution evidence, the accused
statement as contemplated under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.
was recorded wherein the accused denied all the
incriminatory materials. However, the accused did not
choose to place his version about the incident on record by
examining himself or by filing a written submission as is
contemplated under Section 313(5) of Cr.P.C. Learned
Magistrate thereafter heard the matter in detail and by
order dated 07.05.2020 convicted the accused for the
offence punishable under Section 134(a) and (b) of the
Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and under Sections 279
and 304A of IPC and has ordered a fine of Rs.1,000/- and
Rs.3,000/- respectively with default sentences. Being
5
aggrieved by the same, the accused preferred an appeal in
Crl.A. No.59/2010.
6.
Learned judge after securing the records and
hearing the parties in detail