SIDDAPPA S/O CHANDAPPA HADAPAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 102717/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION No.102717/2021 (KLR, RR/SUR)
Between
1.
Siddappa s/o Chandappa Hadapad
Age 51 years, Occ:Agriculture
r/o Adavibavi, Taluk:Kushtagi
District:Koppal, Now at r/o Ilkal
Taluk: Hungunda, Dist:Bagalkot
Pin:587118
2.
Smt.Yallamma w/o Basappa Hadapad
Age 50 years, Occ: Household work
r/o Adavibavi, Taluk:Kushtagi
District:Koppal, Now at r/o Ilkal
Taluk: Hungunda, Dist:Bagalkot
Pin:587118.
3.
Mahantesh s/o Basappa Hadapad
Age 26 years, Occ:Agriculture
r/o Adavibavi, Taluk:Kushtagi
Now at r/o Ilkal, Taluk: Hungunda
Dist:Bagalkot, Pin:587118.
4.
Smt.Mahantamma w/o Basappa Nandawadagi
Age 55 years, Occ: Household work
r/o Gotagi, Taluk:Kushtagi
District:Koppal.
2
5.
Smt.Sharavva w/o Shankrappa Hadapad
Age 46 years, Occ: Household work
r/o Kyadigumpa, Taluk:Kushtagi
District:Koppal, Pin:583277.
6.
Smt.Shanta w/o Girish Davakani
Age 45 years, Occ: Household work
r/o Bijapur, Taluk Bijapur, Dist: Bijapur
Pin:586101.
7.
Smt.Kamalamma w/o Kodaleppa Hadapad
Age 40 years, Occ: Household work
r/o Ilkal, Taluk Hungunda, Dist:Bagalkot
Pin:587118.
8.
Huligemma @ Ashwini
w/o Basavaraj Navi, Age 22 years,
Occ: Household work, Taluk:Kulagod
Taluk: Mudalagi, Dist:Belagavi
Pin:591312.
...Petitioners
(By Sri Shivaraj P Mudhol, Advocate)
A n d
1.
The State of Karnataka
Represented by its Secretary
Department of Revenue
M S Building, Bengaluru.
2.
The Deputy Commissioner
Koppal, Taluk Koppa, Dist: Koppal
Pin : 583231.
3.
The Tahasildar, Kushtagi
Taluk Kushtagi, Dist: Koppal
Pin: 583277.
Ramalingappa s/o Dandangouda
Malipatil, since died by his L.Rs.
3
4.
Ramappa s/o Ramalingappa Malipatil
Age 49 years, Occ: Agriculture
r/o Adavibavi, Taluk: Kushtagi
Dist: Koppal, Pin: 583277.
5.
Mohan s/o Kemappa Chowhan
Age 35 years, Occ: Agriculture
r/o Adavibavi, Taluk Kushtagi
Dist: Koppal, Now at r/o Ilkal
Taluk : Hungunda, Dist: Bagalkot
Pin 3 587118.
... Respondents
(By Smt.Girija S Hiremath, HCGP for R1 to R3
Sri Rajshekhar Burji, Advocate for R5,
R4 - served)
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order ated
5.1.2006 in No.TAKAKU.RRT.20/2005-06 passed by the 3rd
respondent vide Annexure-F and etc.,.
This writ petition coming on for orders this day, the Court
passed the following:
ORDER
The mother of the 1st petitioner purchased the agricultural
land in Sy.No.76, Hissa No.4 measuring 16 acres 15 guntas
situated at Adavibavi village, Hanamasagar Hobli, Kushtagi Taluk
through a registered sale deed dated 9.4.1975 from the father of
the 4th respondent. Pursuant to the same, the name of the
mother of the 1st petitioner was mutated as owner in the
revenue records in respect of the land in question.
4
2.
When things stood thus, the father of the 4th
respondent filed an application with the 3rd respondent so as to
invalidate the sale deed executed in favour of the mother of the
1st petitioner. The Tahsildar by order dated 5.1.2006 invalidated
the sale deed executed in favour of the mother of the 1st
petitioner. Hence, this writ petition.
3.
I have considered the submissions of the learned
counsel for the parties.
4.
Admittedly,
the
mother
of
the
1st
petitioner
purchased the land in question through a registered sale deed in
her name and her name was mutated in the revenue record as
owner in respect of the land in question inconformity with
Section 128 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act.
5.
When such being the case, the Tahsildar by
exercising power under Section 25 of the Karnataka Land
Revenue Act has invalidated the registered sale deed executed in
favour of the mother of the 1st petitioner. Section 25 of the said
Act empowers the Revenue Court to make such orders as may