MR. SANAL – Appellant
Versus
MRS. GEOVIYA – Respondent
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
R.P.F.C. No.138 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
MR.SANAL JOSEPH BERNARD PARAYCADE,
S/O. MR.BERNARD PARAYACADE,
AGED 37 YEARS,
R/AT 102, KALINA VILLAGE,
1ST FLOOR, SANTACRUZ (E)
MUMBAI- 400012
WORKING AT TATA MEMORIAL
CENTRE HOSPITAL,
DR.E.BORGES MARG,
PAREL, MUMBAI-400012,
MAHARASTRA.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.G.RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MRS.GEOVIYA GEORGE NENMANIKKARA,
D/O. MR.NENMANIKKARA POULOSE GEORGE,
W/O. MR.SANAL JOSEPH BERNARD PARAYACADE,
AGED 29 YEARS,
R/AT 102, 1ST FLOOR, REJOICE APTS,
PINTO9S LANE, BUNTS HOSTEL,
MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT.
PIN-575004.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.M.S.VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S 19(4) OF THE FAMILY
COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 12.7.2016 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.27/2015 ON
THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT D.K,
MANGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED
UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS RPFC COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This revisio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.