SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MR. SANAL – Appellant
Versus
MRS. GEOVIYA – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO

R.P.F.C. No.138 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

MR.SANAL JOSEPH BERNARD PARAYCADE,

S/O. MR.BERNARD PARAYACADE,

AGED 37 YEARS,

R/AT 102, KALINA VILLAGE,

1ST FLOOR, SANTACRUZ (E)

MUMBAI- 400012

WORKING AT TATA MEMORIAL

CENTRE HOSPITAL,

DR.E.BORGES MARG,

PAREL, MUMBAI-400012,

MAHARASTRA.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI.G.RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

MRS.GEOVIYA GEORGE NENMANIKKARA,

D/O. MR.NENMANIKKARA POULOSE GEORGE,

W/O. MR.SANAL JOSEPH BERNARD PARAYACADE,

AGED 29 YEARS,

R/AT 102, 1ST FLOOR, REJOICE APTS,

PINTO9S LANE, BUNTS HOSTEL,

MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT.

PIN-575004.

&RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.M.S.VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE)

2

THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S 19(4) OF THE FAMILY

COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE

DATED 12.7.2016 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.27/2015 ON

THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT D.K,

MANGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED

UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.

THIS RPFC COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This revisio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top