KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT MEGHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.RP 129/2017
Crl.R.P.No.129/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.129/2017
BETWEEN:
SMT. MEGHA
W/O SRINIVASA MURTHY ABIB
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/O NO.373
YWLLANKODI NILAYA
I MAIN, 6TH A CROSS
TATA NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 092.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI.P B UMESH, ADV. FOR
SRI R.B. DESHPANDE, ADV.)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY HEBBAL TRAFFIC POLICE STATION
BENGALURU CITY - 560 024.
(REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
BENGALURU-560 001.)
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.R D RENUKARADHYA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED
UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
Crl.R.P.No.129/2017
2
THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AND
SENTENCE
DATED
18.11.2015
PASSED
BY
THE
M.M.T.C.-V BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.2467 OF 2013 AND
THE
JUDGMENT
AND
ORDER
DATED
06.01.2017
PASSED BY THE LX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.1479 OF
2015 (CONVICTED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 279 AND 304 (A) OF IPC AND
ACQUIT THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGES LEVELED
AGAINST HER.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON
FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
“Whether impugned order of conviction and
sentence passed against the petitioner suffers any
illegality, impropriety or incorrectness?” is the question
involved in this case.
2.
The
petitioner
was
prosecuted
in
CC
No.2467/2013 on the file of Metropolitan Magistrate
Traffic Court-V, Bengaluru for the offence punishable
under Sections 279 and 304(A) of IPC on the basis of
charge sheet filed in Crime No.26/2013 of Hebbal Traffic
Police. Crime No.26/2013 was in turn registered on the
basis of complaint of PW1- Venkatesh as per Ex.P1.
Crl.R.P.No.129/2017
3
3.
For
the
purpose
of
convenience,
the
petitioner will be referred to henceforth as accused.
4.
PW1 is the husband of deceased Lakshmi.
On 20.03.2013 at 11.30 A.M near 1st Main, Tatanagar
within jurisdiction of Hebbal Traffic Police station,
Lakshmi met with a motor vehicle accident. Initially she
was treated by PW4 Dr.Tulasi in Raghavendra clinic
situated near the scene of offence and she was shifted
to K.C.General Hospital. From there she was shifted to
Baptist Hospital, Hebbal. She succumbed to injuries at
2.00 p.m on the same day.
5.
PW1 filed the complaint alleging that the
petitioner at the above said date, time and place drove
Maruthi Van bearing No.KA-04-MD-1904 in a rash and
negligent manner, hit Lakshmi with the said vehicle and
caused her death. PW7-Police Inspector of Hebbal
Police Station received the complaint and registered FIR
in Crime No.26/2013.
Crl.R.P.No.129/2017
4
6.
PW.7 said to have visited the scene of
offence on the same day and conducted the spot
mahazar as per Ex.P2 in the presence of PW2 and PW3,
prepared the sketch of scene of offence as per Ex.P12.
On the requisition of PW7, the inquest Ex.P7 was
conducted. PW7 said to have recorded statements of
PW4 to PW6 and got identified the accused by them. He
received I.M.V report-Ex.P11 and P.M report-Ex.P10 and
filed the charge sheet.
7.
On taking cognizance, the accused was
tried for the offence punishable under Sections 279 and
304(A) of IPC. On such trial, by the judgment and
order dated 18.11.2015 the trial Court convicted the
accused for the offence punishable under Sections 279
and 304(A) of IPC. Further for the offence under Section
279 of IPC, the trial Court sentenced her to fine of
Rs.1,000/- and for the offence under Section 304A of
IPC sentenced her to simple imprisonment of one year
and fine of Rs.5,000/- with default sentence.
Crl.R.P.No.129/2017