- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR.JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO.37477 OF 2016(LA-KIADB)

BETWEEN

PRASHAD RAGHUNATH DESHPANDE

S/O RAGHUNATH DESHPANDE

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

#3637, JAKKUR LAYOUT

NEAR JAKKUR FLYING GROUND

OPPOSITE NITESH BUILDING

YALAHANKA

BANGALORE - 62.

&PETITIONER

(BY SMT.LATHA.S.SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT

M.S.BUILDING, VEEDHANA VEEDHI

DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD

BENGALURU - 560 001.

BY ITS SECRETARY

2.

THE EXECUTIVE MEMBER

KIADB

NRUPATHANGA ROAD

BENGALURU - 560 001.

3.

SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER

KIADB

- 2 -

IST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVANA

NRUPATUNGA ROAD

BENGALURU - 560 001.

&RESPONDENTS

(BY, SRI A.C.BALARAJ, AGA FOR R1

SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV FOR R2 TO R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES

226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

PRAYING

TO

DIRECT

DECLARING

THAT

THE

NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 3(1), SECTION 28(1)

OF KIADB ACT 1966 VIDE C1536 SPQ 2004 DATED

14.02.2005 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1,

ORDER UNDER SECTION 28(3) OF KIADB ACT 1996

DATED 04.06.2005 IN NO: LAQCR:6:04-05/306/2005-

06

PASSED

BY

THYE

RESPONDENT

NO.3

AND

NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 28(4) OF KIADB ACT

1966 VIDE NO. CI.190 SPQ 2005 DATED 25.06.2005

PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DEEMED TO HAVE

LAPSED IN TERMS OF SECTION 24 OF THE RIGHT TO

COMPENSATION

AND

TRANSPARENCY

IN

LAND

AQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND TESETTLEMENT

ACT, 2013 IN RESPENCT OF THE LAND BEARING

SY.NO.100/2

MEASURING

0-03

SITUATED

AT

YEDEHALLI VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA

TALUK, RURAL DISTRICT (ANNEXURE "A", "A1", "B"

AND "C") AND ETC.

- 3 -

THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR

ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING

ORDER

R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

The petitioner as well as learned counsel for the

petitioner have filed a memo dated 10.08.2021 seeking

leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with

liberty to approach this Court if need be.

2.

The memo is placed on record subject to all

just exceptions.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Sd/-

JUDGE

VN/RJ