VENUGOPAL S/O. KRISHNAREDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 101020/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.101020/2021
BETWEEN:
VENUGOPAL S/O: KRISHNAREDDY,
AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST,
R/O: BOTTADAPPANAHALLI (VILLAGE)
RQ: GOURIBIDANUR,
DIST: CHIKKABALLAPUR-561208.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SAURABH A.SANDUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH YEALLAPUR POLICE STATION
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH-580001.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF
CR.P.C., SEEKING TO GRANT BAIL TO THE PETITIONER
IN YELLAPUR POLICE STATION CRIME NO.233/2019
WHICH IS REGISTERED AS S.C.NO.5009/2021 ON THE
FILE OF I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, U.K.
KARWAR,
SITTING
AT
SIRSI,
ITIRNERARY
AT
YELLAPUR, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 406, 413 AND 420 OF IPC.
2
THIS
CRIMINAL
PETITION
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This petition is filed by the accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9,
for brevity) seeking bail in Crime No.233/2019
of Yellapur Police Station, registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 406, 413
and 420 of The Indian Penal Code (hereinafter
referred to as the 8IPC9, for brevity).
2.
It is the case of the prosecution that
one Sri. Krishna Subbayya Naik, has filed the
complaint stating that he and his wife were
holding account in the State Bank of India and
on 17.12.2019, the complainant had gone to
withdraw cash from an ATM and since he was
unable to withdraw cash from the ATM, he
3
requested an unknown person standing near
him to help him out. The said unknown person
inserted the card in ATM and complainant
himself has entered the 4 digit secret pin and
thereafter
an
amount
of
Rs.20,000/-
(Rs.10,000/- was withdrawn twice) as required
by the complainant came to be withdrawn by
the complainant. That on 18.12.2019, when the
complainant went to withdraw amount from the
ATM since he did not get any cash, the
complainant called up his son and informed
regarding the said fact. When the son of the
complainant came to the spot and tried to draw
money from the ATM, it was found that the
ATM card had name of Roopa appearing on it
and as such the complainant and his son came
to
know
that
the
ATM
card
had
been
exchanged. Later, on 19.12.2019, in the
4
morning
hours
the
complainant
started
receiving
messages
on
his
mobile
phone
regarding withdrawal and later on inquiry with
the bank, it was learnt by the complainant that
a sum of Rs.40,000/- had been withdrawn from
his account. Hence, the said complaint is filed
on 19.12.2019 and it came to be registered in
Yellapur Police Station in Crime No.233/2019
for the offence under Section 420 of IPC. The
petitioner came to be arrested on 03.11.2020.
The Investigating Officer after the investigation
has filed the charge sheet against the present
petitioner.
He
filed
bail
application
in
S.C.No.5009/2021 and the same came to be
rejected by the I Addl. District and Sessions &
Judge, Sirsi, Itinerary at Yellapur, by order
dated 09.04.2021. Therefore, the petitioner is
before this Court seeking bail.
5
3.
Heard the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner and the learned High Court
Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
4.
It is the contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioner that the accused-
petitioner is innocent, he has not committed
any offence as alleged and he has been falsely
implicated in this case. The petitioner has been
implicated only on the basis of his voluntary
statement said to have been given by him.
There are no materials to connect the present
petitioner with the alleged theft of the ATM
card of the complainant and withdrawal of
Rs.40,00