SRI KARIYAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 34129/2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY , 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.34129 OF 2013 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI KARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
S/O CHIKKANNA,
RESIDING AT NO.761
(NEAR SUBRAMANYA TEMPLE)
VENKATAPURA MAIN ROAD,
TEACHERS COLONY,
BANGALORE-560 034.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI.K. DIWAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSISONER
BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 001.
3. THE TAHSILDHAR
BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 001.
4. SMT.RAJESHWARAMMA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
W/O LATE N.S.RAJANNA,
5. SRI CHANDRASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
S/O LATE N.S.RAJANNA,
6. SRI MANJUNATH
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
S/O LATE N.S.RAJANNA,
2
7. SRI CHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
S/O LATE NARAYANA SWAMY,
8. SRI.G.KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
S/O LATE CHIKKAGUNDAPPA,
9. SRI GOVINDARAJU
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
S/O LATE CHIKKAGUNDAPPA,
SL.NOS.4 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT
NAGAWARA VILLAGE,
ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE-560 045.
10. SMT.VENKATAMMA
MAJOR IN AGE,
W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
(S/O LATE APPAJAPPA),
NAGAWARA VILLAGE,
ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE-560 045.
11. SMT.PARVATHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
W/O LATE H.KRISHNAPPA,
RESIDING AT CHANAKYA LAYOUT,
NEAR MANJUNATHA BAR,
ARABIC COLLEGE POST, NAGAWARA VILLAGE,
BANGALORE-560 045.
12. SRI NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,
S/O LATE R.VENKATAPPA,
RESIDING AT GOVINDAPURA,
ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
NAGAWARA VILLAGE,
BANGALORE-560 045.
13. SMT.AKKAYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,
W/O K.ANJANAPPA,
RESIDING AT 45, TARABANAHALLI,
CHIKKAJALA POST,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
3
14. SMT.RUKMINIYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
W/O SRI RAJANNA,
RESIDING AT NO.45,
TARABANAHALLI, CHIKKAJALA POST,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
15. SMT. MUNIHANUMAKKA @ HANUMAKKA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
W/O G.MUNISWAMY,
RESIDING AT NO.114,
MUNISHAMAPPA GARDEN,
SOUPARNIKA NILAYA,
ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE-560 045.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.A.R. SRINIVAS, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI.C.V. ANNAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6;
SRI.N. GANGADHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R10;
SRI.B. ROOPESHA, ADVOCATE FOR R11;
SRI.S.K. ACHARYA, ADVOCATE FOR R13;
SRI. VIGHNESHWARA V, ADVOCATE FOR R14;
SRI.K.S. NARAYANASWAMY FOR R15;
R7, R9, R12 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED;
NOTICE TO R8 IS H/S V/O DATED 22.08.2019)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDERS DT.27.6.12, IN RESPECT OF SY.NO. 24/6, VIDE ANN-
E2,
DT.1.4.2011,
SY.NO.34/1,
ANN-F2,
DT.31.9.2012,
SY.NOS.78/2,81/1, 85/8, 88/6, VIDE ANN-G4 DT.27.6.2011,
SY.NO.35/4 VIDE ANN-H2 DT.22.3.2011, SY.NO.78/5, VIDE ANN-
J2, DT.31.9.2012, SY.NO.26/1, VIDE ANN-K2, PASSED BY THE
R3, i.e., THE TAHSILDAR /SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE
NORTH TQ. AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL & UNJUST AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING - B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
4
ORDER
Petitioner is knocking at the doors of the Writ Court for
assailing the six orders made by the third respondent,
whereby the entries in the revenue records standing in his
name have been annulled and in their stead the names of the
private respondents have been loaded.
2.
After service of notice, the official respondents
have entered appearance through the learned Addl. Govt.
Advocate; the private respondents are represented by their
respective counsel; the writ petition is being resisted on the
ground of availability of alternate remedy of appeal u/s 136(2)
or Revision u/s 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act,
1964.
3. Learned advocate appearing for respondent Nos.4,
5 & 6 opposes the Writ Petition contending that when the
sales were made, they were not the owners of property
inasmuch as the lands were already a