SHRI HUSAINSAB IMRAN S/O HASANSAB SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 100417/2021
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100417/2021
BETWEEN:
SHRI.HUSAINSAB @ IMRAN
S/O HASANSAB SHAIKH,
AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
R/O: PATEL NAGARA, DANDELI,
UTTARKANNADA-581325.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADV.)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY DANDELI POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY S.P.P.
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD-580008.
&..RESPONDENT
(BY SRI:RAMESH B.CHIGARI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
438 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE ACCUSED ON
BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN RELATION TO
DANDELI TOWN POLICE STATION IN CRIME NO.82/2020
DATED 16.09.2020 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 8C, 20(b)(ii)(A) OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND
PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985.
- 2 -
THIS
CRIMINAL
PETITION
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
PASSED
THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner-accused No.3 is before this Court seeking
grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.82/2020 of Dandeli
Town Police Station, initially registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic
Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter
referred to as 8the NDPS Act9 for the sake of brevity), on the
basis of first information lodged by the informant-Yallappa,
the PSI of Dandeli Town Police Station, against accused Nos.1
and 2.
2.
Brief facts of the case are that, the informant
stated that on 16.09.2020 at about 9.00 a.m., while he was
on duty at Dandeli Town Police Station, he received credible
information regarding illegal possession and transportation of
Ganja, without any pass or permit by two persons.
Immediately, he informed this fact to his Higher Officers and
as per their directions, he proceeded to the spot along with
his staff and two panchas. The informant reached near the
cross at Reserve Forest and from there, they proceeded by
- 3 -
walk inside the forest. They found accused Nos.1 and 2 each
with a bag. They were collecting money from 4 to 5 persons
and were giving them something. The informant with the help
of his staff, held raid in the presence of panchas. It is found
that accused Nos.1 and 2 were in possession of Ganja and
they were selling the same to the general public without
having any pass or permit. Accused Nos.1 and 2 were having
separate plastic bags. On search, it was found that accused
No.1 was possessing 854 grams of contraband worth
Rs.18,000/- and he was having cash of Rs.600/-. Similarly,
accused No.2 was in possession of 1088 grams of contraband
worth Rs.20,000/- and cash of Rs.900/-. All these materials
were seized at the spot and the seizure mahazar was drawn.
It is stated that other accused persons who were at the spot,
ran away from the scene of occurrence. Thus, accused Nos.1
and 2 have committed the offences punishable under Sections
8(c), 20(b)(ii)(A) of the NDPS Act. Therefore, the informant
requested the police to register the case and to initiate legal
action against the accused. Accordingly, the police registered
the case and took up investigation.
- 4 -
3.
Heard Sri.Venkatesh M.Kharvi, learned Counsel
for the petitioner and Sri.Ramesh B Chigari, learned High
Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused
the materials on record.
4.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the present petitioner is arraigned as accused No.3 on the
basis of so-called statement given by accused Nos.1 and 2.
The petitioner is not named in the FIR. Accused Nos.1 and 2
are already enlarged on bail. There is absolutely no material
to connect the present petitioner to the offences in question.
He is not required for custodial interrogation. He is the
permanent resident of the address mentioned in the cause
title to the petition. He is ready and willing to abide by any of
the conditions that would be imposed