KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
BANGALORE METROPOLITAN – Appellant
Versus
SRI TIRUPATHI – Respondent
MFA 1139/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
M.F.A. NO. 1139 OF 2014 (MV)
C/W
M.F.A. NO.4096 OF 2014 (MV)
IN M.F.A. NO. 1139 OF 2014 (MV):
BETWEEN:
BANGALORE METROPOLITAN
TRANASPORT CORPORATION,
CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H. ROAD,
SHANTHINAGAR,
BANGALORE. 560027
BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. D VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
SRI. TIRUPATHI,
S/O LATE RAJUGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS.
2.
SMT. GOVINDAMMA,
W/O TIRUPATI,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
3. SRI. RAJU,
S/O TIRUPATI,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
PAPAIAH GAU
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
PAPAIAH GARDEN (P.P.GARDEN),
2
MANJUNATHA COLONY,
BSK 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 085.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. VANISHREE.J, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST
THE
JUDGMENT
AND
AWARD
DATED:07.12.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.1146/2013 ON
THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE
JUDGE, & XXII ACMM, MACT, BENGALURU, AWARDING
COMPENSATION OF Rs.7,08,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 6%
P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT IN
TRIBUNAL.
IN M.F.A. NO.4096 OF 2014 (MV):
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. TIRUPATHI,
S/O LATE RAJUGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS.
2. SMT. GOVINDAMMA,
W/O TIRUPATI,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
3. SRI. RAJU,
S/O TIRUPATI,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
PAPAIAH GAU
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
PAPAIAH GARDEN (P.P.GARDEN),
MANJUNATHA COLONY,
BSK 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 085.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SMT. VANISHREE.J, ADVOCATE)
AND
3
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
B.M.T.C., ACCIDENT UNIT,
SHANTHINAGARA, K H ROAD,
BANGALORE-27.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. D VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST
THE
JUDGMENT
AND
AWARD
DATED:7.12.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.1146/2013 ON
THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL.SMALL CAUSES JUDGE &
XXII A.C.M.M., BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION
THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
J U D G M E N T
This appeal by the BMTC-Management of the
offending vehicle challenges the judgment and award dated
07.12.2013
made
by
MACT,
Bengaluru,
allowing
M.V.C.No.1139/2013
whereby,
a
compensation
of
Rs.7,08,000/- with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum,
subject to usual condition of bank deposit has been
awarded. The challenge is on the ground of award of
excessive compensation.
2.
In a vehicular accident, that happened on
20.01.2013, because of rash and negligent driving of a
road train bearing Registration No.KA-01-F-2493 belonging
4
to the appellant herein, one Mr.T. Madesha, who was
riding his motorbike bearing Registration No.KA-02-ED-
457 fell to the ground and thereafter, his head was run
over by offending vehicle. Consequently, the victim
breathed
his
last.
In
the
claim
petition
in
M.V.C.No.1146/2013 filed by the unfortunate parents and
the elder brother of the deceased, the appellant herein had
filed the Written Statement specifically taking up the
ground of contributory negligence.
3.
To prove their claim, the Claimant No.3-the
elder brother of deceased Mr. Raju got examined himself as
PW.1 and in his evidence, ten documents came to be
marked as per Exhibits P1 to P10, which inter alia
comprised of Police Papers, IMV Report, Post Mortem
Report, Ration Card, Election Identity Card. From the side
of the owner of the offending vehicle, one Mr.Vishwanath
Kamble, the driver of the said vechicle, was examined as
RW.1
and
a
judgment
of
the
Criminal
Court in
C.C.No.495/2013 came to be marked as Exhibit R.1,
wherein, RW.1 was acquitted of the charge of rash and
negligent driving resulting into death.
5
4.
The MACT, after adverting to the rival pleadings
of the parties and after appreciating the evidentiary
material on record, has entered the impugned judgment
and award.
5.
The learned counsel for the Management