KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P.SANDESH, J
THE CHIEF ENGINEER, HEMAVATHI CANAL ZONE, CAUVERY NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MAHADEVAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in filing must be adequately justified. (Para 1) |
| 2. failure to provide satisfactory reasons leads to dismissal. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. consistency in compensation aligned with prior orders. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard on I.A.No.1/2025 for condonation of delay of 527 days in filing the review petition.
2. In support of the application, an affidavit is sworn to by the deponent stating that the order was passed on 03.07.2023 and the office was not having possession of the documents of the lower court records and also the calculation sheet prepared by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Canal Zone, Tumkur, at the time of the appeal was heard by this Court. But the calculation sheet prepared by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, was obtained only after our counsel has directed us to get the documents now relying on as Annexure B, after visiting the Land Acquisition Office and now handed over the same to our counsel. In view of the advice made by the counsel, the present review petition is filed.
3. This application is resisted by filing the statement of objections by the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4. A detailed objection statement is filed with reg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.