Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SRI MANJUNATHA A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court addressed the petitions under section 438 for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. factual basis for allegations was explored, indicating substantial evidence against the petitioners. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court differentiated the severity of allegations against respective petitioners. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. the court ruled on the requests for bail based on the merits of each petitioner's circumstances. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
Accused Nos.1 and 4 in Crime.No.54/2025 registered by Vemagal Police Station, Kolar District for the offences punishable under Sections 316(4), 316(5), 318(4), 306, 61(2) R/w 3(5) of BNS, 2023 are before this Court in these two petitions under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 seeking regular bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. FIR in Crime.No.54/2025 was registered by Vemagal Police Station, Kolar District for the aforesaid offences against Madhu and others on the basis of the first information dated 19.03.2025 submitted by Sri Ashok Kumar M, Assistant General Manager and authorized representative of Canara Bank, Regional office, Kolar. Apprehending arrest in the said case, the petitioners herein, who are arraigned as accused Nos.1 and 4 i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
