Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, J
NAGARATHNAMMA W/O VENKARAMAYYA H D/O MUNINAGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
MUNINAGAPPA S/O LATE SONNAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's request for protective measures against property alienation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's findings affirm need for trial to resolve property rights. (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. court underlines the necessity to preserve the plaintiff's property rights during litigation. (Para 8) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.7 at length.
2. This appeal is preferred by the appellant being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order dated 05.06.2025 passed in O.S.No.1088/2024 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., at Devanahalli, wherein the interim application filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking an ad-interim order of temporary injunction by restraining defendant Nos. 1 to 6 or anybody claiming through them from alienating or creating any third party interest in respect of suit schedule property, till the disposal of the suit.
3. It is the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court that, the suit was filed for partition and separate possession of the schedule properties. According to her, plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 to 6 constitute a joint Hindu undivided family. She and defendant Nos. 1 to 6 continue
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
