Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
ANJOOM REHAMAN @ ANJOOM S/O MUSTAFA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the bail application and evidence presented. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the bail application. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. investigation findings and lack of direct evidence. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. During the course of investigation, petitioner herein was arrested on 13.09.2024 and subsequently, remanded to judicial custody. After completing investigation, chargesheet has been filed against two persons and petitioner is arraigned as accused No.2 in the chargesheet. His bail application filed before the jurisdictional Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.No.2363/2025 was rejected on 08.04.2025. Therefore, he is before this Court seeking regular bail.
6. Per contra, learned HCGP, who was granted time to make her submission, after getting necessary instructions, submits that except the confession statement of accused No.1, there is no other material to connect the petitioner to the crime.
8. Perusal of the material on record would go to show that based on credible information received on 09.09.2024, the first informant, after obtaining necessary permission from his higher officers, h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
