Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
MR. MOHAMMED ZAID – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion of trial delays and judicial custody. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 5) |
| 3. court observations on trial fairness and rights. (Para 8) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, all the material charge sheet witnesses who are examined before the Trial Court have turned hostile to the case of the prosecution. Accused is aged about 23 years and is in judicial custody for nearly two years and he has no any other criminal antecedents. Accordingly, he prays for allowing the petition.
6. FIR in the present case was registered against the petitioner based on the first information dated 02.09.2023 submitted by one Majid Pasha (C.W.1) who is one of the eye- witnesses to the alleged incident in the present case. In the FIR as well as in the charge sheet, it is alleged that the deceased and Anwar Hussain had gone near the house of the accused and complained against him to his brother, and the petitioner-accused No.1 who was in the 3rd floor of the building came down armed with a knife and attacked the deceased and others. Petitioner-accused allegedly stab
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
