Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RAVI V HOSMANI, J
SHABBIR MIYAN – Appellant
Versus
NAGAMMA W/O LATE VISHNUREDDY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and claim over property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding temporary injunction. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's evaluation of injunction request. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final decision and implications. (Para 14 , 15) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 202808 OF 2023 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SHABBIR MIYAN S/O ABDUL RAZAQ, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HUMNABAD PROPER, TQ: & DIST: BIDAR – 585 401.
THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SHAKEEL AHMED S/O.MD.ABDUL KHAYUM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O: BIBI GALLI, HUMNABAD, TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI K.M.GHATE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. NAGAMMA W/O LATE VISHNUREDDY, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: VILLAGE DHUMMANSUR TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR – 585 330.
2. PRABHU REDDY S/O LATE VISHNU REDDY, AGE ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: VILLAGE DHUMMANSUR, TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR – 585 330.
3. SAI REDDY S/O LATE VISHNU REDDY, AGE ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: VILLAGE DHUMMANSUR, TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR – 585 330.
4. RAJ REDDY S/O LATE M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
