Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
SRI. HRATIK S/O. SADASHIVA PAWALE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution case details and context (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments and claims about the petitioner's innocence (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence evaluation for bail (Para 7) |
| 4. conditions for granting bail and final order (Para 8) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
2. The petitioner-accused No.9 has filed this petition under Section 483 of BNS S-2023 (439 of Cr.P.C.) to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.61/2024 (S.C.No.5002/2025 pending on the file of 7th Addl. District and Sessions Judge Belagavi sitting at Chikkodi) of Nippani Police, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 61(2)(A), 103, 238, 190, 49 R/W 3(5) of of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNS , 2023’).
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner–accused No.9 has been falsely implicated in the present case and is innocent. The petitioner’s name does not appear in the First Information Report, and none of the eyewitnesses to the incident have mentioned the name of the petitioner. Therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary. It is further submitted that the petitioner is employed a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
