Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V SRISHANANDA, J
SMT. GULLAPALLI GANGA BHAVANI – Appellant
Versus
M/S DATTAREYA TRADERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition details and context of the complaint under section 138. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments concerning necessity and impact of exercising the amendment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's ruling on allowing amendment while ensuring protection of the accused's rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
Heard Sri Mahantesh Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Krupa Sagar Patil, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , with the following prayer:
“WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above amongst others, it is humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash the impugned Order dated 25.01.2024 passed by the learned II Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Sindhanur, in C.C.No.891/2018 vide Annexure-E in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. Petitioner is the complainant who launched the criminal prosecution against the respondents for the alleged offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act .
4. It is the contention of the petitioner that due to inadvertence some dates are wrongly m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
