Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 14327
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
E.S.INDIRESH, J
MR. PUTTASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 6802 OF 2021 (KLR-RR/SUR)
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. VICTOR MANOHARAN S.
For the Respondents: SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R6, SRI. R.C. NAGARAJ.
The court dismissed the petition as the underlying matter had already been resolved, confirming the need for finality in decisions.
Headnote:The petitioners challenged the order dated 04.02.2020 in Revenue Appeal No.441/2016 for a direction to dispose of R.A.No.72/2020 under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. The court noted that R.A.No.72/2019-2020 was disposed of on 13.02.2023, negating the need for further orders. The petition was dismissed. The legal issue was whether an existing appeal warranted further consideration. The court reasoned that since the matter was already decided, no further action was necessary. Hence, the petition was dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court heard arguments from both parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. decision already made, petition dismissed. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this petition the grievance of the petitioners is to direct the respondent No.2 to dispose of R.A.No.72/2020 (Annexure-C) for pending consideration.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.7 has filed a memo stating that respondent No.2 has disposed of the R.A.No.72/2019-2020 on 13.02.2023. In that view of the matter, no further orders have to be made in this writ petition.
4. It is open for the petitioners herein to challenge the order dated 13.02.2023 passed by the respondent No.2, if so advised, in a manner known to law.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed.
