Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
A.S. VASANTH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMI A ALIAS SHRUTI A – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the claim of low income and the necessity of maintenance payments are addressed. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. (Para 4) |
| 3. upheld the integrity of the order unless proven otherwise. (Para 5) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record.
2. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the impugned order in order to point out that the income of the petitioner is extremely low and the revisional court committed error in directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- to the respondents pending disposal of the revision petition and as such the impugned order deserves to be set aside.
3. A perusal of the material on record indicates that respondent No.1 is the wife of the petitioner and respondent No.2 is their son. On 12.08.2024, the respondents filed Crl.Misc.No.1180/2024 under Section 144 BNSS (Section 125 Cr.P.C.) seeking maintenance of Rs.30,000/- from the petitioner. The said petition is being contested by the petitioner. Along with the said petition, the respondents filed an application I.A.No.1 for inte
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
