SRI. CHETAN S/O. VEERANNA GOUDAR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 14418

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
SRI. CHETAN S/O. VEERANNA GOUDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SANTOSH B. MALAGOUDAR
For the Respondents: SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL

Table of Content
1. brief facts regarding robbery and allegations. (Para 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding petitioners' innocence. (Para 5)
3. court's observations on evidential insufficiency. (Para 6 , 7)
4. legal reasoning for granting bail. (Para 8)

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

2. Crl.P.No.102248/2025 is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 5 and Crl.P.No.102250/2025 is filed by petitioner-accused No.6 under Section 483 of BNS S-2023 (439 of Cr.P.C .) to enlarge them on bail in Crime No.72/2025 of Chikodi Police, registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS , 2023’).

During the course of the investigation i.e. on

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. It is only on the voluntary statement of accused No.1, these petitioners have been implicated in the case. The petitioners are ready to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court. Hence, prays to allow the petitions.

HC-KAR

504, 506, 323, 324 of IPC are registered.

8. It is well established principles of law that, while considering the b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document