Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
SRI. CHETAN S/O. VEERANNA GOUDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. brief facts regarding robbery and allegations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding petitioners' innocence. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's observations on evidential insufficiency. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal reasoning for granting bail. (Para 8) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Heard Sri.Santosh B. Malagoudar, learned counsel for the petitioners-accused Nos.2, 5 and 6 and Smt.Kirtilata Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-State.
2. Crl.P.No.102248/2025 is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 5 and Crl.P.No.102250/2025 is filed by petitioner-accused No.6 under Section 483 of BNS S-2023 (439 of Cr.P.C .) to enlarge them on bail in Crime No.72/2025 of Chikodi Police, registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS , 2023’).
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are as under: On 26.04.2025, at about 2.50 pm., near Umrani Ghat at Chikodi, when the first informant was returning in his Tata Canter bearing No.KA-22/D-1179 along with an HC-KAR amount of Rs.1,90,000/- received from the sale of ground nuts at Sangli Desai shop, some unknown persons followed his vehicle in their motorcyc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
