Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
E.S.INDIRESH, J
SRI M.R.NARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of adverse orders and maintainability of the writ. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. evaluation of legal remedies under specific acts. (Para 4) |
| 3. conclusive dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 5) |
ORAL ORDER
Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 4.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned AGA.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing order dated 03.09.2024 in R.A.No.171/2024 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar, order dated 14.06.2024 in R.A.No.511/2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Kolar, and order dated 11.02.2025 in RRT.Dispute.C.R.No.194/2024 passed by the Tahasildar, Kolar.
4. Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the impugned order at Annexure-M passed by the respondent No.4 in RRT.Dispute.C.R.No.194/2024 has been passed pursuant to the direction issued by respondent No.3 (Annexure-K).
5. On careful examination of findings recorded at Annexure-M, there is no re-grant order passed insofar as land in question is concerned. In that view of the matter, the petitioners are having efficacious remedy under the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act , 19
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
