Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, J
REHANANAWAZ D/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BMTC – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks consideration for light work due to medical reasons. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. employer must comply with rules regarding consideration. (Para 4) |
| 3. court orders decision on representation within two months. (Para 5 , 6) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ACCOMMODATE LIGHT WORK TO THE PETITIONER IN THE RESPONDENTS CORPORATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 20(4) OF THE Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 WITH PAY PROTECTION BY CONSIDERING HIS REPRESENTATION DATED 24/04/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE C TO THE WRIT PETITION BY REFERRING THE PETITIONER TO ANY ONE OF THE MEDICAL BOARD AND TO TAKE DECISSION ON THE OPINION TO BE GIVEN BY THE MEDICAL BOARD UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER
Sri. Hareesh Bhandary, learned counsel who is present before the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on
24.04.2025, petitioner has submitted a representation to the respondents to assign li
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
