Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 14804
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI. G.S. SACHIN – Appellant
Versus
SMT.MANGALA G.M. – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 21631 OF 2023
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR G.M.
For the Respondents:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR G.M.
For the Respondents:
A writ petition becomes infructuous when the underlying issue is resolved by the trial court.
Headnote:This case involves a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought to set aside an order from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Davanagere. Upon filing the petition, the trial court disposed of the suit, rendering the petition moot. The court concluded that the petition was infructuous and ordered its withdrawal accordingly. The petition is disposed of.
Act Referred
Constitution of India: Article 227
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The above named Petitioner submits as follows:
It is submitted that after filing the present petition the trial court disposed of the suit in question and hence the present petition does not survives as it has held infructious. Hence this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the petition in the interest of justice and equity.
Hence the Memo."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
