SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 14804

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI. G.S. SACHIN – Appellant
Versus
SMT.MANGALA G.M. – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 21631 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR G.M.
For the Respondents:

A writ petition becomes infructuous when the underlying issue is resolved by the trial court.

Headnote:This case involves a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought to set aside an order from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Davanagere. Upon filing the petition, the trial court disposed of the suit, rendering the petition moot. The court concluded that the petition was infructuous and ordered its withdrawal accordingly. The petition is disposed of.

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:

"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The above named Petitioner submits as follows:

It is submitted that after filing the present petition the trial court disposed of the suit in question and hence the present petition does not survives as it has held infructious. Hence this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the petition in the interest of justice and equity.

Hence the Memo."

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top