KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI AMIR AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
SRI ANOOP DAGA NAGAVENI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final decision on the dismissal of the civil revision petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. the plaintiff's claim for recovery based on unpaid dues and dishonoured cheque. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding the limitation period and its applicability. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner – defendant No.1(c) is before this Court calling in question an order 10.03.2025, passed by the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Court, Bengaluru (CCH-87), whereby, an application – I.A.No.1 under Order VII Rule 11 (a) and (d) r/w. Section 151 of the CPC, seeking rejection of the plaint, in Com.O.S.No.520/2022, comes to be rejected.
2. Heard Sri Jayaraj Gowda M.N., learned counsel for petitioner and Smt. Sowbhagya D., learned counsel for respondent No.1.
3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
The first respondent is the plaintiff. The plaintiff is the proprietor of one M/s.J.R. and Company, which is in the business of wholesale supply of steel and other allied materials. During the business transaction with one M/s.Tatra Metal Industries, a partnership firm of respondent Nos.5 and 6 as its partners, respondent No.1 – plaintiff supplies material under various inv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.