Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR, J
TANVEER S/O. MOHAMMEDRAFIQ SHAMSHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing procedural and representation processes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of unqualified practice raised. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evidence of qualifications produced. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's directive on regulatory actions. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)
1. Heard learned counsel Sri.Anwarali D Nadag for the petitioner, learned AGA Sri.Sharad Magadum for respondent No.1, learned counsel Smt.Archana Magadum for respondent No.2, learned counsel Sri.Y.K.Divate for respondent No.3, learned counsel Sri.Rajashekhar Burji for respondent No.5 and the learned counsel Sri.V.M.Sheelvant for respondent No.6.
2. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus for a direction to respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 to initiate appropriate legal action against respondent No.6.
3. The petitioner, who is a law student and a social activist has filed this present petition making allegations against respondent No.6 who is claiming to be an advocate and practicing in Gokak, portraying himself as an advocate, even though he is not eligible to practice. It is the vehement contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.6
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
