Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V SRISHANANDA, J
BASAVARAJ S/O MADEVAPPA BALI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of trespass and initial complaint details. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments on the lack of justification for the cognizance order. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence and necessity for magistrate's scrutiny. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. judicial reasoning regarding the sufficiency of evidence for proceeding. (Para 12) |
| 5. final ruling on the petition. (Para 13) |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
Heard Sri. R.S.Lagali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Smt. Arati Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and Sri. Avinash A. Uploankar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
2. This petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhite, 2023, with the following prayer:
“Wherefore, on looking into all the above mention grounds amongst others, the petitioners most respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow this criminal petition and thereby quash the order of taking cognizance and issue of process Dt. 13-12- 2024 passed by the Hon’ble Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC Court, Shorapur, in Criminal Case No.2005/2024 (Arising out of Hunasa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
