KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
RANGA MOUNIKA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing a petition for quashing an fir based on a joint settlement. (Para 3) |
| 2. court validates the joint memo and quashes the fir in interest of justice. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following relief:-
“ Wherefore, the petitioner most humbly pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the FIR in Cr.No.876/2024 filed by the first respondent South East CEN Crime Police against the petitioner for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 316, 318(3) of BNS 2023 and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of the I.T. Act, 2000, before the Hon'ble 45th ACMM, Bangalore, in the interest of justice."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner – accused and learned counsel for second respondent – complainant have filed a Joint Memo dated 25.06.2025, duly signed by petitioner, second respondent and their respective learned counsel, and the same is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused, petitioner and learned counsel for the second respondent and its counsel are physically present before the Court and they admit the contents of the Joint Memo dated 25.06.2025, which reads as under:-
"JOINT MEMO The Petitioner filed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.