Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S SUNIL DUTT YADAV, J
MR. HARSH KIRIT PANCHMIA – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge on defreezing action. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. restrictions on funds access established. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORAL ORDER
2. It is the case of the petitioner that in terms of the Email communication, the transaction date and disputed amount is revealed and it is clear that the disputed amount is only Rs.2,000/-.
4. Taking note of Annexure-C and the disputed amount is only Rs.2,000/- insofar as Bank Account of the petitioner bearing No.50100421740089 maintained at HDFC Bank Ltd., Marathahalli, Bangalore, the Bank could mark their lien for Rs.2,000/- and order of defreezing would be restricted to such amount.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
