Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J
SMT. RAJESHWARI K M., @ RAGINI K.M. – Appellant
Versus
SRI NAGARAJA H. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of hardship were presented, questioning the court's procedure. (Para 3) |
| 2. the court noted compliance with legal procedures and justified dismissal. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the orders passed in MC.No.334/2022 dated 05.12.2024 by the Family Court, Davanagere, whereby the court has dismissed the I.A.No.3 filed under Section 24 of the Family Court Act .
2. The MC is of the year 2022 and the IA is filed on
17.01.2023 and even till the impugned order dated 05.12.2024 is passed, the wife had not chosen to file the statement of assets and liabilities as per judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Rajneesh Vs. Neha , [(2021) 2 SCC 324]. The family Court considering the said fact has held that said application is not maintainable and dismissed the I.A.No.3. Assailing the same, the wife is before this court.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/wife submits that the court has not given her a reasonable opportunity and had dismissed the application in this manner and it would cause lot of hardship and prejudice to the wife.
4. This court is not proposing to issue notice to the respondent as disposal of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
