SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 15690

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
SRI HARISHIKESH SIMHADHARI RAMADASS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11441 OF 2024 | C.C.NO.15818/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. NATARAJ H.T.
For the Respondents: SRI. JAGADEESHA B.N., SMT. N.S. CHITHRAJA DEVI

Court quashed criminal proceedings based on mutual settlement between the accused and the complainant under IPC and Dowry Act.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 498A - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 4 - Quashing of proceedings - Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of DP Act, based on a Joint/Declaration Affidavit asserting compromise between parties - Court acknowledged the mutual agreement and quashed the pending criminal proceedings. (Paras 2, 3, 4)

(B) Joint Affidavit Submission - Court recognized the presence of both parties and their legal representatives in court, affirming their willingness to settle the matter efficiently. (Paras 2, 3)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash the proceedings initiated by the 2nd respondent under Section 498A IPC, wherein a compromise was reached before the Bangalore Mediation Centre, indicating no desire to continue prosecution against the petitioner.

Findings of Court:
Proceeding against the petitioner for the offences referred were quashed based on the agreed terms of the parties reflecting the settlement arrived at.

Table of Content
1. respondents reached a mutual settlement, leading to desire to quash current proceedings. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court recognizes importance of parties' agreement in legal proceedings. (Para 4)

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:-

“a. Call for records in C.C.No.15818/2020 for the alleged offences punishable under Section 4 98A IPC r/w 3 & 4 DP Act as against the petitioner is concerned.

b. Quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.15818/2020 pending on the file of Hon’ble 9th Addl. CMM Court, Bengaluru City under Section 4 98A of IPC r/w 3 & 4 of DP Act as against the petitioner is concerned.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner – accused and 2nd respondent – complainant and her counsel have filed Application along with Joint / Declaration Affidavit duly signed by the petitioner, 2nd respondent and their respective counsel and the same is taken on record.

3. Petitioner – accused and his counsel and 2nd respondent and her counsel are physically present before the Court and they admit the contents of the Joint / Declaration Affidavit, which reads as under:-

JOINT / DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT “We, Harishikesh Simhadhari Ramadass, S/o. Late Simhadhari Krishnaswamy Ramadass Naidu, Aged about 32 years, residing at: Flat G-5, Vanshree Solitaire, 4th Main, 1st Cross, Chinnapanahalli, Bangalore North, Marathahalli, Bangalore-560 037 and Smt. Sneha Mary Cameons, W/o. Harishikesh Simhadhari Ramadass, aged about 34 years, residing at No.101, Innerspaces, Glory Fields Choodasandra Road, Bengaluru-560 099, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:-

1. We submit that we are the petitioners and the respondent No.2 in the above case. We know the facts and circumstances of the case and hence we are swearing to the contents of this affidavit.

2. We submit that respondent No.2 Smt. Sneha Mary Cameons, lodged a complaint in Crime No.124/2020, Parappana Agrahara Police Station and thereafter charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners for offence punishable under Section 4 98A & 34 of IPC, or Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act which is pending before the IX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore in C.C.No.15818/2020.

3. We submit that by the intervention of friends and family, we have compromised ourselves in M.C.No.5078/2020 before the Bangalore Mediation Centre and I (Respondent No.2) is not inclined to prosecute the aforesaid case against the petitioners and prays this Hon'ble Court to quash the entire proceedings in Crime No.C.C.No.15818/2020 dated 04.05.2020 pending on the file of Hon'ble IX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore under Section 4 98A & 34 r/w 3 & 4 of DP Act as against the petitioners are concerned.

4. We submit that, if this Hon'ble Court is not pleased to accept the accompanying Joint Affidavit, the petitioners and the respondent No.2 will suffer irreparable loss and great hardship. Whereas, no hardship will be caused to the prosecution if the accompanying joint affidavit is allowed. We do hereby solemnly affirm and state that this is our name and signature and the contents stated above are true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief.”

4. In view of the aforesaid settlement entered into between the petitioner and 2nd respondent, I pass the following:

ORDER (i) The petition is disposed of in terms of Joint / Declaration Affidavit dated 23.06.2025.

(ii) The proceedings in C.C.No.15818/2020 (arising out of Crime No.124/2020 of 1st respondent – Police) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 4 98A & 34 of IPC read with Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act , pending on the file of IX Addl.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top