KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
E.S.INDIRESH, J
SRI CHIKKATHIMMAIAH, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners argue against authority of the respondents during an ongoing appeal. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court finds an existing alternative remedy makes the petition unmaintainable. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORAL ORDER
In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the order bearing No.LND(N)CR:3/10-11 dated 22.09.2010 (Annexure-
AE) passed by the respondent No.2.
2. Heard, Sri. S. Rajendra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri. Manjunath K., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondents - State and Sri. B.V. Muralidhar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 - BBMP.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that, the rights of the parties has to be crystallized in a pending appeal before this Court in RFA.No.2196/2022 filed under Section 96 of CPC. It is also submitted that, when the matter is pending consideration before this Court, the respondents authorities have issued the impugned order at Annexure-AE and also learned counsel submitted that, the said impugned order at Annexure-AE was passed during the pendency of W.A.No.218/2008 at Annexure- Y, and as such, learned counsel contended that the respondents
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.