Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
BASAVARAJ S/O. FAKKIARAPPA CHALLAL – Appellant
Versus
The STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. narrative of the crime and accusation's context. (Para 4) |
| 2. arguments by counsel about the petitioner's role. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence and considerations for bail. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's decision and conditions for bail approval. (Para 10) |
HARIHAR Location: High Court of THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.439 OF CR.P.C.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) Heard Sri.L.S.Sullad., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Abhishek Malipatil., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent – State.
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case is as under;
4. During the course of investigation, the name of petitioner/accused No.10 is revealed by witnesses and hence, he was arrested by the respondent/police, and in turn remanded to judicial custody.
6. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader contended that the petitioner is involved in the offence under Section 302 of IPC, there is prima-facie case against him, if he is released on bail, he may tamper the prosecution witnesses and hamper the trial. Thus, considering the nature and gravity of offence, petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
