Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.G.PANDIT, T.M.NADAF, JJ
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR CHAVADANNAVAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to transfer notification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. observations on authority and validity (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments on authority of transfer. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's interpretation of lawful authority. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
The petitioner - Chief Engineer of Panchayat Raj Engineering Department is before this Court under Article– 226 of the Constitution of India , aggrieved by the order dated 23.01.2025, in Application No.4886/2024 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru (for short ‘Tribunal’) by which his application questioning the Notification bearing No.RDP/304/SSK/2024, dated 03.10.2024 (Annexure-A4) issued by the first respondent transferring the petitioner as Chief Engineer at Commissionerate, Rural Development Department and posting the fourth respondent in his place as Chief Engineer, PRE Department.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner who is in the cadre of Chief Engineer was posted as Chief Engineer, Panchayat Raj Engineering Department under Notification dated 11.12.2019, by the second respondent– DPAR. Under the impugned notification dated 03.10.2024 (Annexure-A4), iss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
