Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR, J
SRI. H. MARUTI S/O. YALLAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD DISTRICT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners own land earmarked for residential use. (Para 2) |
| 2. deputy commissioner failed to consider relevant provisions. (Para 3) |
| 3. failure to act within time leads to deemed approval. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. court mandates action within specified timeframe. (Para 5) |
| 5. petition allowed, directing conversion application acceptance. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)
1. Heard learned counsel Sri.G.I.Gachchinamath for the petitioners. Learned AGA Sri. Madanmohan Khannur is directed to take notice for the respondent- State.
2. The petitioners are the owners of the land bearing Sy.No.22/15 measuring 4 guntas situated at Unkal, Hubballi, district Dharwad. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the land of the petitioners fall within the city limits and land has also been earmarked for residential purpose in the CDP, so also contends that the planning authority i.e., the Hubballi- Dharwad Urban Development Authority has issued the ‘Land Use Certificate’ with regard to the land of the petitioners being reserved partially for residential and partially for road. It is submitted that the petitioners had applied for conversio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
