Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT, MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF, JJ
SRI.K.N.RAJAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on petitioner's deputation and repatriation (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding repatriation order and its implications (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of deputation rules and complaints (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's decision on the legality of repatriation and authority's discretion (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final disposition of the petitions (Para 14) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
In both the writ petitions, Sri.K.N.Rajappa, Deputy Range Forest Officer is the petitioner.
Though the matters are listed for preliminary hearing, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the petitions are taken up for final disposal.
2. Brief facts of the case in W.P.No.12719/2024 are that:
The petitioner, Deputy Range Forest Officer was deputed to work at Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (for short “BBMP”) under O.M. dated 25.09.2019 (Annexure-B). It is stated that the petitioner is said to have reported to duty at BBMP on 13.12.2019. It is submitted that the BBMP, by order dated 17.11.2021 (Annexure-A8) posted one Sri.V.Jagadish to petitioner’s place and repatriated the services of the petitioner. Questioning the said order dated 17.11.2021, the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
