Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V SRISHANANDA, J
RAJEPPA S/O MANIKAPPA BAVAGI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the accident leading to conviction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments around evidence appreciation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence supporting conviction. (Para 15 , 21 , 22 , 26) |
| 4. constitution of the law adhered to. (Para 24) |
| 5. final order and changes in sentencing. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
Heard Sri Gurubasava C. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jamadar Shahabuddin, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/State.
2. The revision petitioner is the accused, who suffered an order of conviction for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304A of IPC and Section 187 of IMV Act.
3. The facts in the nutshell for disposal of the revision petition are as under:
Upon the complaint lodged by Sri Md. Jameer, Humnabad Traffic Police registered a case in Crime No.27/2016 on 27.02.2016 initially for the offences under Sections 279 and 338 of IPC read with Section 187 of IMV Act.
4. Gist of the complaint averments would reveal that on 27.02.2016 in the morning hours, as usual, the son of the complainant left the home to re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
