THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

Sri.Naveen Kumar., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person.

7, either personally or through video conferencing.

27.07.2023. A perusal of the office note depicts that respondent No.2 is served and unrepresented. He has neither engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted the case as a party in person.

3. Counsel for the petitioner has urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.

The controversy involved in the present writ is with regard to impleading of the applicants as necessary parties to the suit proceedings.

The underlined idea of Order I Rule 10(2) of CPC is whether the presence of an individual is/was necessary to finally determine the rights of parties or not.

In order to come on record as party to the proceedings, the petitioners herein have to show that the presence of proposed impleading defendants is necessary in order to enable the Court effectually and completel