KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, J
SRI AMEER JAAN @ AMEER @ AMEERA JAN – Appellant
Versus
SRI Y CHETAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of injuries and treatment costs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on compensation enhancement. (Para 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's evaluation on compensation awards. (Para 5 , 6 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final compensation judgment and rationale. (Para 7 , 9 , 18) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
The petitioner/appellant has filed this appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act , 1988, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 29.08.2019 passed in M.V.C.4323/2017 by the IX Additional Small Causes Judge and ACMM, Court of Small Causes, and Member, MACT-7, Bengaluru. By filing this appeal, the appellant seeks to enhance the compensation so awarded by the tribunal.
The factual matrix:
2. It was the case of the petitioner before the tribunal that, on 15.12.2016 at about 8.30 a.m., when he was moving on his motor cycle bearing registration No.KA- 53-S-7646 from Muthkur towards Varthur, near Muthusandra Lake, the driver of TATA Indica Car bearing registration No.KA-53-A-7981 by driving his Car in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the petitioner's motor cycle. Because of this impact, petitioner fell down and sustained subtrochanteric fracture righ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.