SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 17597

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
DIPAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks following reliefs.

“ To quash the arrest and remand order dated:25.06.2024 in Cr.No.48/2024 of Byappanahalli P.S. for offence punishable under Section 20(b) (ii) (c) of NDPS Act pending on the file of xxxiv Addl.City City & Sessions Judge and Special Judge for NDPS Cases at Bengaluru (CCH-35) in Spl.C.No.1997/2024 and consequently direct Respondent No.3 to release the petitioner from judicial custody in the interest of justice.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned SPP – I along with HCGP for respondents - State and perused the material on record. For the order proposed, notice to de-facto complainant is dispensed with.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the material on record in order to point out that the requisite grounds of arrest as mandated under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India as well as Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, 2023 ( Section 50 and 50A of Cr.P.C.) and Section 52 of the NDPS Act had not been issued either to the petitioner and/or to his relatives, friends and no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top