Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J
MRS. SUMITHRA, W/O. HARISH – Appellant
Versus
MR. HARISH, S/O. RUKMAYYA POOJARY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's observations on the relevance of amendments. (Para 2) |
| 2. facts regarding ongoing divorce and maintenance proceedings. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments about the necessity of amendments to pleadings. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's dismissal rationale regarding trial stage amendments. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The parties are referred to as wife and husband for the sake of convenience.
No.161/2019 seeking restitution of conjugal rights and the wife had filed M.C.No.361/2019 seeking divorce. The M.C. filed by the husband seeking restitution of conjugal rights was allowed and the M.C. filed by the wife seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty was dismissed by the Family Court. The wife had preferred MFA and the same is pending consideration. The wife had also filed criminal miscellaneous petition seeking maintenance. When the matter is at the stage of trial i.e., by way of this pleadings the petitioner/wife wants to incorporate the pleadings stating that the husband has committed the act of cruelty.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner No.1/wife submits that already the M.C. filed seeking divorce was dismissed. Against both the MCs, MFAs are filed and the same are pending consid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
