SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 17783

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SALMANKHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9253 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI P.B. UMESH, SRI R.B. DESHPANDE
For the Respondents: SMT. WAHEEDA M.M

Court grants bail for minor drug offense based on personal liberty and prior bail history of co-accused.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)

(B) - Bail application filed under CRPC - Petitioner arrested with small quantity of ganja - Court grants bail highlighting the nature of the offence and past bail history of co-accused, finding the detention unjustified. (Paras 6, 7, 8)

(B) Consideration for bail - Small quantity and past bail history of co-accused necessitates granting bail, balancing personal liberty against the risk of committing further offences. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
Applicant was arrested based on credible information regarding the sale of ganja, with him found in possession of 0.430 grams after the arrest of another accused during the raid. The total weight of seized contraband from the first accused was 1 kg 190 grams.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner has been in custody since 29.05.2025, and the co-accused has already been released on bail. The nature of the charges under the NDPS Act does not warrant further detention as the seized quantity from the petitioner is minor.

Issues: The main issue addressed was the suitability of the petitioner for bail considering the small quantity of drugs and previous bail granted to co-accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that due to the minor quantity of drugs and the already established bail to a co-accused, the justification for continued detention does not hold, necessitating bail.

Result: Bail granted with conditions.

Table of Content
1. legal context and framing of the bail application (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of arrest and possession of drugs (Para 3 , 5)
3. court's observations regarding prior bail (Para 4)
4. removal of restrictions based on minor quantity (Para 6)

ORAL ORDER

Accused No.2 in Crime No.113/2025 registered by KTJ Nagar Police Station, Davanagere District for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is before this Court seeking regular bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.113/2025 was registered by KTJ Nagar Police Station, Davanagere District against one Syed Shujauddin and the petitioner herein for the aforesaid offences, on the basis of first information dated 25.05.2025 received from Sri Sunil Kumar, Police officer, attached to KTJ Nagar Police Station. During the course of investigation, the petitioner was arrested on29.05.2025 and subsequently remanded to judicial custody.

4. The bail application filed by the petitioner before the jurisdictional Sessions Court in Crime No.113/2025 was dismissed on 18.06.2025. Therefore, he is before this Court.

5. Perusal of the material on record would go to show that, based on the credible information received on 25.05.2025 a raid was conducted to the alleged spot where a person was selling contraband article ganja to the public. From the said report, accused No.1 was apprehended and from his possession contraband article allegedly ganja totally weighing 1 kg 190 grams was recovered and seized under panchanama. It appears that based on the confession statement of accused No.1, the petitioner was arrested on 29.05.2025 and from his possession 0.430 grams of ganja was recovered and seized under panchanama.

6. Undisputedly, the seized contraband article from the possession of the petitioner on 29.05.2025 is of small quantity. The maximum punishment for the alleged offences is imprisonment for a period of one year. The petitioner is in custody in the present case from

29.05.2025. In the earlier case registered against him, he is said to have been enlarged on bail. Accused No.1 has been already granted regular bail in the present case. 7. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter, I am of the opinion that the prayer made by the petitioner for grant of regular bail is required to be answered affirmatively.

8. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.113/2025 registered by KTJ Nagar Police Station, Davanagere District for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, subject to the following conditions:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top