SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 18097

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
PRAKASH @ UADAGATTI PRAKASHA S/O. ESHWARAPPA, SMT. SHARADAMMA @ UDAGATTI SHARADAMMA W/O. U. PRAKASH, UMA @ UDAGATTI UMA D/O. PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102168 OF 2025 (439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI SRINIVAS B. NAIK
For the Respondents: SHRI JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP

Court ruled no prima facie case for abetment of suicide; allegations of harassment insufficient without direct evidence of instigation.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Grant of regular bail - Allegations of dowry-related harassment leading to suicide - Petitioners were not in cohabitation with the deceased at the time of her death, hence no prima facie case established for abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306. (Paras 8, 10, 11, 12)

(B) Abetment of Suicide - To establish abetment under IPC Section 306 requires clear mens rea and an active role in instigating the act - Mere allegations of harassment not sufficient for conviction without evidence of direct act leading to suicide. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The deceased was married to accused No.1 and subsequently harassed for dowry, leading to her suicide. Allegations included physical and mental torture by the petitioners, who are the in-laws of the deceased. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
Petitioners were denied bail as no prima facie case was established for charges under Section 306 of IPC, thus allowing for bail with specified conditions. (Paras 10, 12)

Issues: Main issues concerned the alleged abetment of suicide and whether the relationship dynamics allowed for such allegations. (Paras 8, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the evidence presented did not support a charge of abetment, emphasizing the need for active instigation for conviction under IPC Section 306. (Paras 10, 11)

Result: The criminal petition is allowed; petitioners are granted bail subject to certain conditions.

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

Heard Sri Srinivas B. Naik, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Jairam Siddi, leaned High Court Government Pleader for respondent – State and Sri Kiran M. Goli, learned counsel for de-facto complainant.

2 This petition is filed by the petitioners / accused Nos.2 to 4 under Section 4 39 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“ Cr.P.C .” for short) / under Section 4 83 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“ BNS S ” for short) to enlarge them on bail in connection with Crime No.17/2025 registered by the Hagaribommanahalli Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 80 , 85, 108 and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“ BNS ” for short”) and Section 3 , 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (“D.P.Act” for short) pending on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Hagaribommanahalli in C.C.No.114/2025.

3 Brief facts of the case of the prosecution are as under:

The de-facto complainant lodged a complaint making allegations that, the deceased Gouramma was given in marriage to accused No.1. Their marriage was solemnized on 14.07.2023. After the marriage, the deceased joined matrimonial home of accused No.1. The relationship of deceased and accused No.1 was in cordial for a period of three months. Thereafter, these petitioners and accused No.1 in collusion with each other started to harass the deceased in connection with demand of dowry, when the deceased pleaded her inability to get more dowry these petitioners alleged to have been harassed her physically and mentally. Thus, the deceased Gouramma informed the same to her parents. Thus, several panchayaths were convened in this regard. Accordingly, accused No.1 and these petitioners were advised to lead normal life. Hence, accused No.1 and deceased shifted to a separate rented house. Thereafter, the petitioners kept quite for few days and again started to pick up quarrel with the deceased and thereby tortured her physically and mentally. When things stood thus, on 29.01.2025 at about 6:30 p.m., petitioner No.3 called the de-facto complainant over phone and informed that the deceased Gouramma committed suicide by hanging herself. Hence, the de-facto complainant lodged the complaint. This leads to registration of FIR and investigation. During course of the investigation, accused No.1 was arrested and he remanded to the judicial custody.

4 Learned counsel for petitioners contended that the petitioners are the innocent of the alleged offences and they are not committed any offences as alleged. These petitioners are in-laws of the deceased. The deceased and accused No.1 were residing in a separate rented house. Therefore, the question of harassing the deceased by these petitioners would not arise and thus the allegations with regard to abetment of suicide or demand of dowry would not arise. It is contended that the alleged offences are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life. These petitioners are ready to abide by the conditions that may be imposed by this Court. With these grounds he prayed to grant bail by allowing this petition.

5 Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the de-facto complainant vehemently contended that there is prima facie case against these petitioners, the investigation was completed and the charge sheet has been filed before the Trial Court. The charge sheet material clearly discloses that there is sufficient material against the petitioners. If they are enlarged on bail, they may abscond and also cause hindrance to the case.

Hence, he prayed for rejection of the bail petition.

6 On perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the marriage of deceased and accused No.1 was solemnized on 14.07.2023. The relationship of the deceased with all the accused was cordial for a couple of years and thereafter accused No.1 and these petitioners started to harass the deceased in connection with the demand of dow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top