Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH, J
SMT.MANGALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI.NANJUNDAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ancestral property claims within a joint family. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant claims and written statements regarding the partition. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. issues framed by the trial court on property rights. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. final ruling and dismissal of appeal. (Para 8 , 13) |
| 5. entitlement of co-parcener in hindu joint family properties. (Para 10 , 12) |
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH)
2. The ranks of the parties henceforth will be considered as per their rankings before the Trial Court, for convenience.
3. The case of the plaintiff is that defendant No.1 is the father of the plaintiff and defendant Nos.2 and 3. The defendant No.1 had two wives namely Smt. Revakka and Smt. Puttamma. Defendant Nos.2 and 3 are the children of defendant No.1, through his first wife. The plaintiff born through the second wife. Admittedly, the parties to the suit are the members of Hindu undivided joint family. The plaintiff contended that the Suit Scheduled Properties are the ancestral and joint family properties of the plaintiff and the defendants. There are no joint possession and enjoyment of the same. Defendant No.1 is managing the joint family properties as a Kartha. The plaintiff requested
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
