Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH, J
SMT.MANGALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI.NANJUNDAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ancestral property claims within a joint family. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant claims and written statements regarding the partition. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. issues framed by the trial court on property rights. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. final ruling and dismissal of appeal. (Para 8 , 13) |
| 5. entitlement of co-parcener in hindu joint family properties. (Para 10 , 12) |
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH)
The appellant is the defendant No.2 before the Trial Court, being aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 01.06.2020 passed in O.S.No.84/2016 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramanagar, preferred this appeal.
2. The ranks of the parties henceforth will be considered as per their rankings before the Trial Court, for convenience.
Factual matrix of the case:
3. The case of the plaintiff is that defendant No.1 is the father of the plaintiff and defendant Nos.2 and 3. The defendant No.1 had two wives namely Smt. Revakka and Smt. Puttamma. Defendant Nos.2 and 3 are the children of defendant No.1, through his first wife. The plaintiff born through the second wife. Admittedly, the parties to the suit are the members of Hindu undivided joint family. The plaintiff contended th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
